Tuesday, September 29, 2009

Slapping versus Attacking

Most players on Sorority Life think that attacking is acceptable whereas slapping is more personal. Don't they realize that attacking is actually more offensive and insulting compared to slapping and it is much much more personal as well.

Opinions I've heard about Slapping:
1)Some people say it's too personal because nobody like to be slapped.
2)Only bitches/bad/low morale/weak players do that.
3)It's a waste of time because by slapping you only reduce the opponents' confident by a few points.

Opinions I've heard about Attacking:
1)It's a game where attacking is acceptable that's why the Attack button is there
2)If you lose, buy more Glams(items for higher Popularity or Charm points) to get stronger and attack back. As long you don't slap, it's okay.
3)If you get lots of money by attacking the same girl, it's that girl's fault for not keeping her money in the bank.

But to Me:
  1. Both are personal attack. Nobody like to be slapped but certainly no one would want to be attacked, humiliated AND mugged!
  2. For stupid Attackers who claim Slap are unacceptable, both Slap and Attack buttons are there for a reason. So don't use this excuse "It's a game where attacking is acceptable that's why the Attack button is there." when trashing the so called bad Slappers because it's true for Slapping too.
  3. Slapping is acceptable as long they don't over use it (serial slaps) more than 6 times. Why? They still can make people lose confidence and can be seen as the cheater/cowardly ways to win a fight. What do I mean by that? Well, when you use Slap, you automatically win because even though it's not a real fight, you still inflict damages to your rival. So if you use it over and over again to win a fight, you're going to make the other player angry because it's not a fair fight at all.
  4. Attacking to me is not acceptable at all. However it's a game, so the button is there for a reason but I really hope the developer will consider changing Attack to DebateBet or anything that is not as horrible as Attack instead.
  5. Why Attack is unacceptable? Well, first you attack the person (would you really want to attack anyone?), which causes both of us to lose confidence (woaa, a meaningless fight, people?) and money to whoever lose in the fight (mugging now?). I just think it's really bad in term of moral.
  6. But it's a game, so it's okay to Attack as long it's not serial attacks or at least do it for a good reason. Why? Serial Attacking the same person is bullying! Okay you hit them, when you win you cause them to lose confidence and money. Losing confidence, money and the fight make them feel really horrible and sad but you keep attacking them which might cause depression. That's bullying in emotional sense. Not to mention you're stealing their money after every fight.
  7. I can never understand players who are proud to say they're always stealing from the rich players. What are they so proud of? It's not even an accomplishment to be proud of. It's shameful. Why can't they earn their money in the right way? I can understand if players attack their rival because of their difference in opinion, idea and so on because fights happen all the time but to attack unsuspecting, innocent people you don't even know for money?
  8. I hate this statement "If you get lots of money by attacking the same girl, it's that girl's fault for not keeping her money in the bank.". What do you mean it's the victim's fault? It's her own hard-earned, honest money. It's your fault for stealing them. Players who often use this statement are usually serial attackers. I really, really, hate it when my own friends use this to defend themselves. Sometimes I wish they got mugged over and over again in real life just so they can take back this horrible statement.

Related Posts:
Sorority Life, Mafia Wars, Pets, YoVille

Related Links:
Tagged

Related Posts with Thumbnails